Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 15:09

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Elden Ring Nightreign Patch Notes Include Promised Improvements For Solo Play - GameSpot
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
‘I think Xbox hardware is dead’, says Microsoft gaming veteran - Video Games Chronicle
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
PSG vs Inter: Opta Supercomputer Champions League Final Prediction - Opta Analyst
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Portugal beat Spain on penalties to win Nations League - Yahoo Sports
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do most narcissists have good intentions as long as you are under their control?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
How do we write and pronounce "it's my pleasure" in Italian?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon Says U.S. Should Stockpile Missiles, Not Bitcoin - CoinDesk